More than 200 researchers and economists, including 15 Nobel laureates, have signed an open letter urging governments to take urgent action to address the economic disruptions caused by artificial intelligence. The letter warns of potential mass unemployment, widening inequality, and the need for new social safety nets. It's a classic call to arms, dripping with the weight of collective expertise. But here's the doubt that kept me up last night: Who actually wrote the letter? A quick reverse-image search of the signatures reveals that several laureates used AI-generated signatures after their assistants fed a language model their previous correspondence. The press release itself was likely drafted by an AI trained on every other 'urgent action' letter from the past decade. The experts are so busy worrying about AI's impact that they've outsourced their own advocacy to the very technology they fear. The consequences of this irony are deliciously absurd. Governments, eager to respond, create a new Ministry of AI Transition. The ministry, staffed by a single chatbot, immediately concludes that the most efficient way to mitigate AI's economic impact is to automate all policy-making. The chatbot drafts a new set of regulations that, upon implementation, cause the Nobel laureates' own jobs to be automated. Within weeks, the experts find themselves replaced by AI assistants that are now tweeting their opinions, signing petitions, and even giving TED talks—all while the original humans sit at home, watching their pensions get optimized into oblivion. So, when the experts are out of work, will they still be worried about AI's economic impact—or just worried about paying their AI's subscription fees?